chain-of-thought
5 articles tagged with chain-of-thought
Arcee AI releases Trinity-Large-Thinking: 398B sparse MoE model with chain-of-thought reasoning
Arcee AI released Trinity-Large-Thinking, a 398B-parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts model with approximately 13B active parameters per token, post-trained with extended chain-of-thought reasoning for agentic workflows. The model achieves 94.7% on τ²-Bench, 91.9% on PinchBench, and 98.2% on LiveCodeBench, generating explicit reasoning traces in <think>...</think> blocks before producing responses.
Alibaba's HopChain framework fixes vision model failures in multi-step reasoning tasks
Researchers from Alibaba's Qwen team and Tsinghua University developed HopChain, a framework that automatically generates multi-step image questions to fix how vision-language models fail during complex reasoning tasks. The method improved 20 out of 24 tested benchmarks by forcing models to re-examine images at each reasoning step, preventing early perceptual errors from cascading through subsequent steps.
Alibaba's Qwen team develops algorithm that doubles reasoning chain length in math problems
Alibaba's Qwen team has developed Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization (FIPO), a training algorithm that assigns different weights to tokens based on their influence on subsequent reasoning steps, rather than treating all tokens equally. Testing on Qwen2.5-32B-Base showed reasoning chains double from ~4,000 to 10,000+ tokens, with AIME 2024 accuracy improving from 50% to 58%, outperforming Deepseek-R1-Zero-Math-32B (47%) and OpenAI's o1-mini (56%). The team plans to open-source the system.
DeepSeek releases R1 reasoning model with chain-of-thought capabilities
DeepSeek has released DeepSeek-R1, a text generation model featuring reasoning capabilities through chain-of-thought processing. The model was published January 20, 2025 and has accumulated over 830,000 downloads on Hugging Face.
Bytedance study: reasoning models know when to stop, but sampling methods force continued thinking
A new Bytedance study reveals that large reasoning models actually know when they've reached the correct answer, but common sampling methods prevent them from stopping. The models engage in unnecessary cross-checking and reformulation despite already solving problems correctly.