model releaseXiaomi

Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6-Pro Becomes Top Open-Weights Model, Trained for $3M According to Xiaomi

TL;DR

Xiaomi released MiMo-V2.6-Pro, a 1.02T-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 42B active parameters, which debuted as the top-scoring open-weights model on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index (46). The company claims the model's RL training run cost roughly $2.6M and completed in 130 hours.

3 min read
0

Xiaomi Enters the Frontier Open-Weights Race

Xiaomi released MiMo-V2.6-Pro on September 21, 2026, a mixture-of-experts model with 1.02 trillion total parameters and 42 billion active parameters per forward pass. According to Artificial Analysis, the model debuted as the top-scoring open-weights model on its Intelligence Index, posting a score of 46 — the highest recorded for an openly-licensed model to date.

The release includes two additional variants: MiMo-V2.6-Flash, described by Xiaomi as balancing intelligence, efficiency, and cost, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, which the company claims delivers up to 20x faster output generation at equivalent quality. All models are released under the MIT license, according to Hugging Face contributor Victor Mustar.

Pricing and Cost Efficiency

Artificial Analysis lists API pricing for MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.435 per 1M input tokens and $0.87 per 1M output tokens. On a cost-per-task basis, Artificial Analysis reports the model lands on its Intelligence-vs-Cost Pareto frontier at $0.13 per Intelligence Index task — meaning no other model currently available delivers comparable intelligence at a lower cost.

Training Cost Claims

Xiaomi's technical report and follow-on commentary from researchers put the total training cost around $3M, with the final reinforcement learning run specifically costing an estimated $2.6M, according to a figure cited by AI researcher Zephyr (@zephyr_z9) on X. That RL run reportedly ran for 130 hours and processed 75 billion tokens. The team says it scaled RL compute along three axes: larger batch sizes (1,568 samples per update) with training contexts up to 1 million tokens and 3.5–3.7 billion tokens per step; a broader multi-task training suite spanning coding, agents, vision, cybersecurity, and music; and increased grader compute for more precise reward signals on long-horizon tasks.

The RL infrastructure reportedly runs on JAX and TPUs, with researcher Tianjun Zhang noting that scaling the system is largely a configuration change rather than a code rewrite — a claim that, if accurate, suggests Xiaomi's RL pipeline is unusually portable and cheap to scale further.

Native Omnimodality and Open Tooling

Xiaomi describes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Flash as "natively omnimodal," trained jointly across text, vision, code, cybersecurity vulnerability reproduction, and music generation tasks rather than bolting modalities onto a text-only base. The company says gains in one domain reinforce performance in others due to shared RL environments.

Xiaomi is open-sourcing the environment code and training recipes behind the model, covering coding/software engineering, cyber vulnerability reproduction (built on the ARVO environment), general knowledge work, web development, and music scoring. The full training datasets — reportedly more than 7,000 RL tasks — have not yet been released.

Background

The release follows a period of unusual transparency from Xiaomi: Fuli Luo, a former DeepSeek engineer now at Xiaomi, publicly livestreamed the model's final RL training runs in the days prior to launch, an atypical move for a frontier lab. Xiaomi is not traditionally grouped among China's established "AI Tiger" labs, making its emergence at the top of an open-weights leaderboard notable to close observers of the Chinese AI ecosystem.

What This Means

MiMo-V2.6-Pro's headline claim — frontier-adjacent intelligence at a fraction of typical training and inference cost — is unverified beyond Xiaomi's own report and third-party estimates circulating on social media. If the $2.6M RL run figure holds up under independent scrutiny, it reinforces a broader trend: post-training and RL infrastructure, not just pretraining scale, is becoming the primary lever for closing the gap between open and closed frontier models. Xiaomi's decision to open-source its RL environments rather than just weights could matter more long-term than the model itself, since reusable, high-quality RL environments may prove as valuable to future labs as pretraining corpora were in the previous cycle.

Related Articles

model release

Microsoft releases FrogNano-4B, an Apache 2.0 coding agent trained with RL on 1,500 synthetic tasks

Microsoft has released FrogNano-4B-2609, a repository-level coding agent derived from Qwen3.5-4B and published under Apache 2.0 with open weights. Microsoft says it was post-trained only with reinforcement learning on about 1,500 synthetic software-engineering tasks, with no stronger-model trajectories. It is evaluated at roughly 131K tokens of context.

model release

Fish Audio releases Drama 3, a 35B-parameter MoE text-to-speech model with 16-speaker support

Fish Audio has released Drama 3, a text-to-speech model with 35B total parameters and 3B active per token, built for multi-character, long-form audio. It supports up to 16 speakers per text, voice cloning, and streaming. Fish Audio reports first audio in under 100 ms on a single H200.

model release

OpenBMB releases MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, an on-device vision model with 4x/16x visual token compression

OpenBMB has released MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, a 1B-parameter multimodal model for single-image, multi-image and video understanding on phones, tablets and local hardware. OpenBMB claims it substantially outperforms Qwen3.5 0.8B in overall score and inference efficiency in Instruct mode. Benchmark figures, context window and training cutoff are not given in the available model card text.

model release

Liquid AI releases open d1-3B decision model: 16 ms on Jetson AGX Thor, 48.57 on Decision Index

Liquid AI released two open-weight decision models, d1-3B (text and image) and the experimental d1-omni-600M (text with image or audio). Unlike generative models, they answer in a single forward pass, and Liquid AI claims d1-3B scores 48.57 on its Decision Index 0.2.1, ahead of all 4B and 9B models it tested.

Comments

Loading...