QIMMA Arabic Leaderboard Discards 3.1% of ArabicMMLU Samples After Quality Validation
TII UAE released QIMMA, an Arabic LLM leaderboard that validates benchmark quality before evaluating models. The validation pipeline, using Qwen3-235B and DeepSeek-V3 plus human review, discarded 3.1% of ArabicMMLU samples and found systematic quality issues across 14 benchmarks.
QIMMA Arabic Leaderboard Discards 3.1% of ArabicMMLU Samples After Quality Validation
TII UAE released QIMMA (Arabic for "summit"), an Arabic LLM evaluation platform that validates benchmark quality before running model evaluations. The platform found systematic errors across widely-used Arabic benchmarks, discarding 3.1% of ArabicMMLU samples and up to 12.3% of MizanQA questions.
Validation Pipeline Details
QIMMA applies a two-stage validation process to 52,164 samples across 109 benchmark subsets:
Stage 1: Two LLMs (Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct and DeepSeek-V3-671B) independently score each sample against a 10-point quality rubric. Samples scoring below 7/10 from either model are flagged.
Stage 2: Native Arabic speakers review flagged samples for cultural context, dialectal nuance, and subtle quality issues.
Quality Issues Found
The validation revealed four categories of systematic problems:
- Answer Quality: Mismatched gold indices, factually wrong answers
- Text & Formatting: Corrupt text, spelling errors, duplicate samples
- Cultural Sensitivity: Stereotype reinforcement, monolithic generalizations
- Gold Answer Compliance: Misalignment with evaluation protocols
Discard rates by benchmark:
| Benchmark | Total Samples | Discarded | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArabicMMLU | 14,163 | 436 | 3.1% |
| MizanQA | 1,769 | 412 | 12.3% |
| PalmX | 3,001 | 25 | 0.8% |
| MedAraBench | 4,960 | 33 | 0.7% |
| FannOrFlop | 6,984 | 43 | 0.6% |
Code Benchmark Modifications
For code evaluation, QIMMA refined Arabic problem statements in 3LM's adaptations of HumanEval+ and MBPP+ without changing task logic:
- 3LM HumanEval+: 145 of 164 prompts modified (88%)
- 3LM MBPP+: 308 of 378 prompts modified (81%)
Modifications addressed linguistic refinement, clarity improvements, consistency normalization, structural corrections, and semantic refinements.
Coverage
QIMMA evaluates 7 domains across 14 benchmarks:
- Cultural: AraDiCE-Culture, ArabCulture, PalmX
- STEM: ArabicMMLU, GAT, 3LM STEM
- Legal: ArabLegalQA, MizanQA
- Medical: MedArabiQ, MedAraBench
- Safety: AraTrust
- Poetry & Literature: FannOrFlop
- Coding: 3LM HumanEval+, 3LM MBPP+
The platform uses LightEval, EvalPlus, and FannOrFlop frameworks with metrics including normalized log-likelihood accuracy for MCQ, F1 BERTScore for generative QA, and pass@1 for code.
What This Means
QIMMA is the first Arabic leaderboard combining open source code, predominantly native Arabic content (99%), systematic quality validation, code evaluation, and public per-sample outputs. The validation results demonstrate that widely-used Arabic benchmarks contain systematic quality issues that can corrupt evaluation results, with discard rates ranging from near-zero to 12.3%. This suggests existing Arabic LLM rankings may be partially based on flawed ground truth data. The platform's approach of validating benchmarks before evaluation sets a new standard for non-English LLM assessment.
Related Articles
Google releases 29 public tasks from 85-task engineering benchmark PLE and opens agent competition
Google AI & Infrastructure announced on November 3, 2026 that it is releasing 29 public tasks, grading tools and an evaluation container for Physical-Engineering's Last Exam (PLE). The 85-task benchmark was developed with Mercor and comes with an open agent competition and leaderboard.
OpenAI publishes LifeVal, an evaluation built partly from a 3,995-respondent survey to test AI on everyday tasks
OpenAI published LifeVal on November 2, 2026, an evaluation built partly from a 3,995-respondent survey. It tracks AI model performance over time on practical tasks such as finding childcare, creating budgets and ordering groceries.
OpenAI introduces BioBasicsBench, a 100-task benchmark for AI agents in everyday wet-lab science
OpenAI has introduced BioBasicsBench, a benchmark of 100 tasks. It measures how well AI agents interpret raw experimental data and handle everyday wet-lab science.
METR report: Anthropic's unreleased Model 4 scores 178.6 on AECI, ahead of Opus 5.5
METR's new report discloses three unreleased Anthropic models, Model 2, Model 3 and Model 4. Model 4 scores 178.6 on Anthropic's AECI index, about 3.9 points above Opus 5.5. Anthropic co-founder Sam McCandlish confirmed the report's main findings but said much information was removed.
Comments
Loading...