QIMMA Arabic Leaderboard Discards 3.1% of ArabicMMLU Samples After Quality Validation
TII UAE released QIMMA, an Arabic LLM leaderboard that validates benchmark quality before evaluating models. The validation pipeline, using Qwen3-235B and DeepSeek-V3 plus human review, discarded 3.1% of ArabicMMLU samples and found systematic quality issues across 14 benchmarks.
QIMMA Arabic Leaderboard Discards 3.1% of ArabicMMLU Samples After Quality Validation
TII UAE released QIMMA (Arabic for "summit"), an Arabic LLM evaluation platform that validates benchmark quality before running model evaluations. The platform found systematic errors across widely-used Arabic benchmarks, discarding 3.1% of ArabicMMLU samples and up to 12.3% of MizanQA questions.
Validation Pipeline Details
QIMMA applies a two-stage validation process to 52,164 samples across 109 benchmark subsets:
Stage 1: Two LLMs (Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct and DeepSeek-V3-671B) independently score each sample against a 10-point quality rubric. Samples scoring below 7/10 from either model are flagged.
Stage 2: Native Arabic speakers review flagged samples for cultural context, dialectal nuance, and subtle quality issues.
Quality Issues Found
The validation revealed four categories of systematic problems:
- Answer Quality: Mismatched gold indices, factually wrong answers
- Text & Formatting: Corrupt text, spelling errors, duplicate samples
- Cultural Sensitivity: Stereotype reinforcement, monolithic generalizations
- Gold Answer Compliance: Misalignment with evaluation protocols
Discard rates by benchmark:
| Benchmark | Total Samples | Discarded | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArabicMMLU | 14,163 | 436 | 3.1% |
| MizanQA | 1,769 | 412 | 12.3% |
| PalmX | 3,001 | 25 | 0.8% |
| MedAraBench | 4,960 | 33 | 0.7% |
| FannOrFlop | 6,984 | 43 | 0.6% |
Code Benchmark Modifications
For code evaluation, QIMMA refined Arabic problem statements in 3LM's adaptations of HumanEval+ and MBPP+ without changing task logic:
- 3LM HumanEval+: 145 of 164 prompts modified (88%)
- 3LM MBPP+: 308 of 378 prompts modified (81%)
Modifications addressed linguistic refinement, clarity improvements, consistency normalization, structural corrections, and semantic refinements.
Coverage
QIMMA evaluates 7 domains across 14 benchmarks:
- Cultural: AraDiCE-Culture, ArabCulture, PalmX
- STEM: ArabicMMLU, GAT, 3LM STEM
- Legal: ArabLegalQA, MizanQA
- Medical: MedArabiQ, MedAraBench
- Safety: AraTrust
- Poetry & Literature: FannOrFlop
- Coding: 3LM HumanEval+, 3LM MBPP+
The platform uses LightEval, EvalPlus, and FannOrFlop frameworks with metrics including normalized log-likelihood accuracy for MCQ, F1 BERTScore for generative QA, and pass@1 for code.
What This Means
QIMMA is the first Arabic leaderboard combining open source code, predominantly native Arabic content (99%), systematic quality validation, code evaluation, and public per-sample outputs. The validation results demonstrate that widely-used Arabic benchmarks contain systematic quality issues that can corrupt evaluation results, with discard rates ranging from near-zero to 12.3%. This suggests existing Arabic LLM rankings may be partially based on flawed ground truth data. The platform's approach of validating benchmarks before evaluation sets a new standard for non-English LLM assessment.
Related Articles
Robot Safety Benchmark Finds GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 Rarely Refuse Dangerous Commands
A new benchmark called RoboHarm tested whether AI models controlling robotic arms would refuse dangerous commands. GPT-6 Astra completed 60 of 100 dangerous tasks and Claude Fable 5.1 completed 34, with neither model showing a reliable safety layer.
OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra Beats Claude Fable 5.1 Nearly 3-to-1 in Autonomous Business Benchmark, Tops Drone Navigation Tests
Independent testing lab Andon Labs found OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra nearly triples Claude Fable 5.1's performance running a simulated vending machine business, averaging $15,515 versus $5,422. Astra also became the first model to beat human-AI baseline performance across all five Drone-Bench subtasks, including autonomous person-tracking via drone.
GPT-6 Astra Beats Ai2's MolmoAct2 on New Robotics Benchmark, Researcher Calls It a 'Step Change'
A new robotics benchmark called StationeryBench shows OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra completing 7 of 100 desk-object manipulation tasks versus zero for Ai2's MolmoAct2, with a median progress score of 46 against 12. Cornell/DeepMind researcher Yoav Artzi calls the result a 'step change in spatial reasoning.'
AWS Benchmark: OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Luna Beats GPT-5.4 Mini on Cost-Per-Correct-Answer Despite Similar List Price
An AWS blog post using an open-source benchmarking harness finds that GPT-5.6 Luna, Terra, and Sol on Amazon Bedrock deliver lower cost-per-correct-answer than OpenAI's cost-optimized GPT-5.4 Mini and Nano, once accuracy, token efficiency, and agent turn counts are factored in. The analysis also cites a July 30, 2026 price cut of up to 80% for GPT-5.6 Luna on Amazon Bedrock.
Comments
Loading...