OpenAI's Ted Sanders: Pick Astra for quality, Sol for balance, Terra or Luna for price
OpenAI's Ted Sanders says most performance gaps between its models come down to model size, but newer, smaller models can beat older, larger ones. He positions GPT-6.1 Terra against the larger Astra and offers a pick-by-budget rule: Astra, Sol, Terra or Luna.
OpenAI's Ted Sanders has offered a rule of thumb for choosing between the company's GPT models: pick Astra for quality alone, Sol if you are somewhat price sensitive, and Terra or Luna if you are very price sensitive. The guidance, reported on October 27, 2026 by The Decoder (Matthias Bastian), accompanies Sanders' categorization of the new GPT-6.1 Terra.
Performance is multidimensional
According to Sanders, model performance has many dimensions. A model that excels at math will not automatically be good at jokes. Even so, he says most performance gaps come down to one variable: model size.
Sanders says OpenAI's model names are hard to simplify because model size, reasoning effort and multi-agent systems are distinct dimensions. Combining them into a single "IQ score" would obscure details.
Size does not explain everything
Sanders notes that size is not the whole story. Newer, smaller models can outperform older, larger ones through better training data or improved architectures.
Where GPT-6.1 Terra sits
Sanders says GPT-6.1 Terra is likely better than the larger Astra at technical communication. He says it roughly matches Astra in image processing and computer use at a much lower price point, but falls short in most other areas.
His summary guidance: "If you care about quality only, pick Astra. If you're a bit price sensitive, pick Sol. If you're very price sensitive, pick Terra or Luna."
What this means
The guidance treats model choice as a trade-off between quality and cost rather than a single ranking. Sanders' point that size, reasoning effort and multi-agent systems are separate dimensions explains why OpenAI's names do not reduce to one score. His comparison of Terra and Astra shows the practical consequence: a smaller, cheaper model can match or beat a larger one on specific tasks such as technical communication, image processing and computer use, while trailing in most other areas. For builders, the task profile and price sensitivity matter more than model size alone.
Related Articles
OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra Pro lists on OpenRouter at $1 input, $5 output per 1M tokens, 1.1M context
GPT-6.1 Terra Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6.1 Terra, served with reasoning.mode set to pro. OpenRouter lists it with a 1.1M context window at $1 input and $5 output per 1M tokens, and says a typical request costs several times more than on Terra.
OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra at $1 per 1M input tokens and $5 per 1M output tokens
OpenAI has released GPT-6.1 Terra, priced at $1 per 1M input tokens and $5 per 1M output tokens. The company describes it as a fast, efficient model built for computer use at scale, with detailed visual reasoning and clearer, more natural writing.
GPT-6.1 Terra is now generally available in GitHub Copilot
GitHub announced that GPT-6.1 Terra, which it describes as OpenAI's newest model, is now generally available in GitHub Copilot. The model is designed for everyday agentic coding and terminal work at a lower cost than GPT-6.1 Sol.
OpenAI says it found the Exponential Time Hypothesis is false, alongside two other discoveries
OpenAI announced three new discoveries in mathematics, computer science and physics. The company says one of them shows that the Exponential Time Hypothesis, a longstanding conjecture, is false.
Comments
Loading...