Liquid AI Releases LFM2.5-2.6B, a 2.6B-Parameter Agentic Model with 128K Context for On-Device Use
Liquid AI has released LFM2.5-2.6B, a 2.6B-parameter model trained on 34 trillion tokens with a 128K context window, built for on-device agentic workloads. The company claims it is competitive with models four times its size on tool use and instruction following.
Liquid AI has released LFM2.5-2.6B, a 2.6-billion-parameter model built specifically for on-device agentic tasks, according to the company's Hugging Face model card. The model extends the LFM2 hybrid architecture with a 128K-token context window and a multi-stage agentic post-training pipeline.
Key Specifications
- Total parameters: 2.69B
- Architecture: 30 layers (22 double-gated short convolution blocks + 8 grouped-query attention blocks)
- Training budget: ~34 trillion tokens
- Context length: 131,072 tokens
- Vocabulary size: 128,000 tokens
- Languages supported: 16, including English, Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Russian, and Hindi
- Model type: Reasoning model — the model always generates a
<think>block before answering, per Liquid AI's documentation
The release includes a base checkpoint (LFM2.5-2.6B-Base) for fine-tuning, plus the post-trained agentic version, and is distributed in GGUF, ONNX, and MLX formats for deployment across CPU, GPU, cloud, and mobile environments.
Training Pipeline
Liquid AI pre-trained the model on roughly 34 trillion tokens, followed by a mid-training phase that extended context to 128K tokens. Post-training involved four stages: two rounds of supervised fine-tuning, per-domain teacher specialization, multi-domain on-policy distillation, and what the company calls "agentic reinforcement learning" — training the model directly inside popular agentic harnesses so it learns their tools, system prompts, and interaction patterns.
Benchmark Claims
Liquid AI claims LFM2.5-2.6B outperforms several larger sub-10B models on agentic benchmarks. According to the company's published results, LFM2.5-2.6B scored 56.88 on BFCLv4 versus 60.13 for the 9.7B Qwen3.5-9B, and 85.49 on IFStruct versus 78.50 for the same larger model. On IFBench, LFM2.5-2.6B scored 59.17, ahead of Qwen3.5-4B's 48.40 and Gemma-4-E4B-it's 39.24. On AIME25, it scored 51.87, trailing Qwen3.5-9B's 56.07 but ahead of both Gemma variants tested (26.33 and 34.27). These figures come directly from Liquid AI and have not been independently verified.
Inference Performance
Liquid AI reports decode speeds of 220 tokens/second on an Apple M5 Max and 113 tokens/second on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU, using under 2.5 GB of memory. The company also claims the model reaches close to 15,000 output tokens per second at high concurrency on GPU, positioning it as the fastest model tested in its size class. Pricing is not applicable, as the model weights are freely available on Hugging Face; pricing not yet disclosed for any hosted inference option.
The model supports Pythonic function calling by default, with tool definitions passed via JSON schema in the system prompt or through the tokenizer's chat template. It is compatible with Transformers (v5.0.0+), vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, MLX, and LM Studio.
What This Means
LFM2.5-2.6B targets a specific niche: agentic workloads that need to run locally on phones, laptops, or edge hardware rather than in the cloud. A 2.6B model claiming near-parity with 9B+ models on tool-use and instruction-following benchmarks — if the numbers hold up under independent testing — would be notable for developers building on-device AI assistants where cloud inference costs or latency are prohibitive. The explicit agentic RL training inside real harnesses is a more deliberate approach than typical benchmark-chasing, but Liquid AI's own comparisons should be treated as directional rather than definitive until third-party evaluations confirm them. The company itself notes the model is not recommended for coding agents or knowledge-heavy tasks, signaling this is a narrow-purpose tool rather than a general-purpose competitor to larger frontier models.
Related Articles
OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra Reportedly Automates AI Engineering Tasks at Under $6 an Hour, According to Latent Space Testing
A Latent Space report describes GPT-6 Astra, a new OpenAI model the blog says can autonomously handle AI engineering tasks—training models, labeling data, deploying systems—at an estimated cost of under $6 per hour. The claims, including 97.6% on FrontierMath and 99.9% on ARC-AGI-3, come from independent blog testing rather than an official OpenAI announcement.
Meta's Muse Spark 1.3 Claims #3 Global Ranking, Matches OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol on Coding Benchmarks
Meta Superintelligence Labs shipped Muse Spark 1.3, which the company claims ranks #3 globally on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and matches OpenAI's GPT-5.6-Sol on coding and agentic benchmarks. The model is available now via Muse Code and Meta's API, with open weights and a follow-up model promised soon.
Meta Releases Muse Spark 1.3, a Free Multimodal Reasoning Model with 1M-Token Context
Meta has released Muse Spark 1.3, a multimodal reasoning model with a 1M-token context window, listed as free on OpenRouter. The model targets long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows, though audio input support remains incomplete.
OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra Cuts Hallucinations, But Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks Still Succeed 8.5% of the Time
OpenAI's new GPT-6 Astra model shows major improvements in hallucination rates and jailbreak resistance over predecessor GPT-5.6 Sol, according to OpenAI's system card. However, indirect prompt injection attacks hidden in documents still succeed 8.5% of the time in external testing by Gray Swan, down from 27% but still above rival Claude Opus 5's 4.8% rate.
Comments
Loading...