Google DeepMind's AlphaProof Code formally verifies key Signal protocol guarantees in four weeks
Google DeepMind used a new agentic AI framework, AlphaProof Code, to mathematically prove a number of the Signal protocol's key cryptographic guarantees. The proof-of-concept took four weeks and found no new vulnerabilities. DeepMind is releasing the specification and proof, and WIRED reports the analysis did not cover the entire Signal mobile app.
Google DeepMind used agentic AI to formally verify a number of the Signal protocol's key cryptographic guarantees, completing the proof-of-concept project in four weeks, WIRED reports. The work relies on a new AI framework called AlphaProof Code.
What was verified
Formal verification uses math to check that software functions as intended, meaning it has no critical vulnerabilities. The DeepMind analysis found no new vulnerabilities in the portions of the Signal protocol it examined.
The researchers also ran AlphaProof Code on older versions of Signal that contain known, long-fixed vulnerabilities. The framework correctly identified them and showed that those versions could not be formally verified.
DeepMind is releasing the specification and proof it developed for the Signal protocol analysis to support other formal verification work.
Scope and limits
The analysis was limited in scope. It did not formally verify the entire Signal mobile app. DeepMind researchers describe the findings as one milestone in a larger process.
The team also had a head start from earlier formal verification work by the Signal Foundation. Ehren Kret, Signal's chief technology officer, said in a statement: "While prior formal verification focused on smaller portions of the code, Google DeepMind's approach enables significant expansion." He added that verifying the protocol implementation gives Signal "even greater confidence in our code's privacy guarantees."
Swarat Chaudhuri, a DeepMind research scientist, told WIRED: "We are very excited by this result, but there is a long distance to go before we are able to scale this to all the software of the world, and we want to do that."
Human-AI collaboration process
Chaudhuri says a key advance is a "human-AI collaboration process" in which agents contribute and self-correct at almost every phase while still seeking human input and review at key junctures. He rejected a fully automated approach: "We don't want this sort of vibe world where AI is generating the goals and AI is generating the proofs and basically taking tests that are self-written. There's a middle ground."
According to WIRED, describing the desired software properties, turning them into formulas and developing the proof were all time-consuming for people before AI. Agentic AI can significantly cut the time of the last step, the proof development.
Cost and commercial plans
DeepMind conducted the Signal analysis free of charge as a research project. Google declined to share the cost of the analysis and declined to comment on whether it plans a commercial formal verification product or service. No pricing, benchmark scores or model specifications for AlphaProof Code have been disclosed.
Pushmeet Kohli, chief scientist at Google Cloud and DeepMind's vice president of research, said: "If you can now verify the correctness of these implementations, then you can rest easy." He pointed to banks and other companies that rely on assurances and worry about bugs.
What this means
The result is independent validation of cryptography that, per WIRED, protects large volumes of communications on Signal, Google Messages and WhatsApp. It also shows AlphaProof Code can both confirm a protocol's guarantees and flag versions with known flaws as unverifiable.
The open question, as WIRED frames it, is whether AI-automated formal verification can scale at a workable cost. With the cost undisclosed and no commercial plans commented on, the four-week timeline is the only effort metric available. The released specification and proof give other researchers material to build on. The human review checkpoints in DeepMind's process show how the team intends to keep proofs and goals from being both AI-generated and self-validated.
Related Articles
OpenAI pipeline finds, validates and patches 948 Linux kernel privilege-escalation flaws
OpenAI says it built an autonomous pipeline that found, validated, and generated patches for 948 local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel. The work is published under the title "A thousand fewer paths to root."
ModelBest's LES runs 35B MoE MiniCPM-V 4.7 at over 20 tokens/s on iPhone 18 Pro Max, company says
ModelBest published an engineering write-up on Lookahead Expert Scheduling (LES), the inference system behind MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B. The company reports over 20 tokens per second on an iPhone 18 Pro Max, and has open-sourced the code in its llama.cpp-omni repository.
Tencent releases DSpine draft model for Qwen3.8-27B: 16-token blocks, up to 3.84× agent speedup over autoregressive deco
Tencent has published Qwen3.8-27B-DSpine-b16, a five-layer draft model with a 16-token block size and an 8,192-token sliding window, under Apache 2.0. According to its model card, it beats DFlash2 on acceptance length across five general benchmarks and on end-to-end agent throughput in SGLang.
Baidu discloses ERNIE Evolve, an RSI research system already used to optimize ERNIE 5.5 Flash inference
Baidu ERNIE disclosed its first recursive self-improvement (RSI) progress on November 9: ERNIE Evolve, an automated research system now applied to inference optimization for the upcoming ERNIE 5.5 Flash. Baidu claims state-of-the-art results on NanoChat AutoResearch and NanoGPT Speedrun.
Comments
Loading...