Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro now available in GitHub Copilot public preview
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro, an agentic coding model optimized for autonomous development workflows, is now available in public preview within GitHub Copilot. The model emphasizes efficient edit-then-test loops and tool use in early testing.
Gemini 3.1 Pro — Quick Specs
Gemini 3.1 Pro Reaches GitHub Copilot Users
Google has rolled out Gemini 3.1 Pro to GitHub Copilot in public preview, marking the first wide availability of the company's agentic coding model for software developers. The deployment represents a significant expansion of Gemini's presence in Microsoft's development tools ecosystem.
Model Capabilities
According to GitHub's announcement, Gemini 3.1 Pro excels in executing effective and efficient edit-then-test loops—a critical workflow pattern in modern development where the model iterates on code changes and validates them through testing. The model is designed with agentic capabilities, enabling it to take actions, use tools, and maintain context across multiple development tasks.
Google positions this as a model specifically optimized for coding workflows, distinct from general-purpose language models. Early testing has focused on the model's performance in autonomous coding scenarios where multiple iterations and tool interactions are required.
Public Preview Status
The public preview indicates this is not yet a stable release. GitHub users can begin testing Gemini 3.1 Pro's performance on their codebases, with feedback likely to inform subsequent iterations before a general availability release. GitHub Copilot subscribers with access to preview features will gain early exposure to the model.
This preview deployment also signals Google's strategy to compete directly in the AI-assisted coding space, where Claude (Anthropic) and GPT-4 (OpenAI) currently dominate. By integrating Gemini 3.1 Pro into Copilot—Microsoft's widely adopted coding assistant—Google extends its reach to millions of developers.
What This Means
The Gemini 3.1 Pro preview in Copilot represents meaningful competition in enterprise coding AI. While specific benchmark scores and performance metrics were not disclosed in the announcement, the emphasis on edit-then-test efficiency and agentic behavior suggests Google is targeting real-world development workflows rather than benchmark optimization. For GitHub Copilot users, this adds another model option and potentially improves overall performance quality through competition. The timing also indicates Google is actively pushing Gemini as a viable alternative to established coding models, though adoption will depend on actual performance data that will emerge from public preview testing.
Related Articles
Google Expands Gemini-Powered Ask Maps Globally With Personal Intelligence, Real-Time Transit, Agentic Ordering
Google Maps' Gemini-powered Ask Maps chat is rolling out globally to English speakers in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, and over 150 other countries and territories. The update adds Gmail-based Personal Intelligence, real-time transit data, conversation memory, and agentic capabilities for ordering food and booking hotels.
Anthropic Adds Cross-Session Messaging to Claude Code v2.1.224
Claude Code v2.1.224 introduces cross-session messaging, letting separate Claude Code instances on macOS and Linux send each other summaries to coordinate work. The feature does not support approving permissions or executing commands remotely.
OpenAI Testing ChatGPT Feature to Export Custom Stickers Directly to WhatsApp
An APK teardown of ChatGPT's Android app reveals a hidden 'ChatGPT Stickers' feature that would let users create custom stickers and export them directly into WhatsApp as sticker packs. The feature is unreleased and its public launch timeline is unknown.
Anthropic Sets Claude Code Auto Mode as Default Starting August 14
Anthropic will switch Claude Code's default permission setting to auto mode on August 14 for Pro, Max, and Team users. The company says its safety classifier caught 89% of dangerous commands in testing, compared to 13.6% for human reviewers, and will no longer charge extra tokens for the classifier itself.
Comments
Loading...